[Disclaimer: This post was
drafted last week in the fall-out from what I can only describe in hindsight as
‘hormonally-influenced body dysmorphia’]. Meh. However, give me another three weeks
and the emotions contained within this here post will have resonance again.
...TMI?]
...TMI?]
Come on, now, ladies (and gents,
I’m not exclusive here), I can’t be the only person bemoaning the entire fashion
industry, can I? (And by 'fashion industry' I do of course mean any high street
outlet at which one can pick up a marl-grey t-shirt for under a fiver.)
{via here} |
…Let me put my rather disjointed
opening rant in context.
I’m 5’3. (And a half.)
I’m OK with that. My legs stopped
growing when I was about 11 so between junior school and secondary school I
went from being one of the taller girls in my class to being on the shorter
side of average. (The rest of me stopped growing
upwards around the same time.)
For the last twenty-five years, my
growth has involved a moderate expansion outwards, with one or two blips along
the way. At my thinnest as an adult (and on the brink of being at my unhappiest, I should mention) at 25/26, I
looked like this:
![]() |
{looking spesh, at my best friend's wedding, July 2004} |
The last time I stepped on a set of
scales was well over a year ago, maybe longer, when I was training for the 2012
MoonWalk and my BMI didn’t compute (it was muscle mass, I tell you; MUSCLE MASS!).
{via here} |
The last time I looked at a fashion
or gossip magazine was much longer
ago than that.
At some point after hitting the big
3-0 I made the decision to step away from these gauges. I was never going to be
content with the body I have if I was constantly being reminded by the glossy
synthetic media that some pop singer is down to a size 6, weighs only 7 stone
and is surviving on jars of baby food and cigarettes following her divorce from
some philandering sports icon. (I’m being deliberately non-specific and skirting
delicately around libel, my friends.) Or some actress renowned for her
‘bravery’ in – ooh, shocker – sporting curves
is sooooo much tinier in the flesh.
As if this is the only way to be. As if the message is that you might look
curvy on screen but it’s OK because
you’re a waif in real life ergo you are an attractive person.
Some perspective, please! What’s with this malignant obsession with being the
teeniest we can be? It’s not a contest. Or, it shouldn’t be.
Some years ago now, I got on my high horse (because short-legged folk need high horses, innit?) and wrote into the now-defunct freesheet, The London Paper. My letter was in response to a column written by a model who was complaining about 'real' women (as in "non-models", as in, the rest of us) seeping into the modelling industry via campaigns such as those run by Dove, and essentially putting her out of work.
"OK, so you're not Heidi Klum..."
"Huh..."
Here's the original article, dredged from my very own archive:
And this was my response, marked, you'll note, with my usual excessive verbosity and just a teensy undercurrent of defensive bitterness:
![]() |
{Letter of the Day, you'll note. I thank you.} |
Now, don't get me wrong. To quote Carrie Bradshaw, because sometimes I must, "I'm not a model. I'm one of the real people".
However.
I
still get angry when the magazines I do read (mostly for the home
sections these days) make certain comments about women’s figures,
congratulating the svelte and the slender as if the fact that they exist in a
body at all is some divine mystery in itself, such is their ethereal
transcendence.
And I still get angry when I go
clothes shopping because apparently, apparently,
in the world of ‘fashion’ and again by ‘fashion’ I mean ‘high street’ because
I’m a fairly low-maintenance individual on a salary commensurate with a
creative career, I’m persona non grata.
After a traumatic ten minutes in a
changing room last weekend, I deduced that apparently there are no clothes suitable for women like me. Nup. Nothing for
those of us at a shorter-than-average 5’3 (and a half), with – heaven forbid – a waist
(or something resembling one). There is nothing for those of us whose legs are dis/proportionately
short. A certain low-budget high street fashion outlet (whose name rhymes with
Lime Nark) does not appear to stock jeans with legs shorter than 30 inches (I measured mine with
a tape measure – they’re about 28 inches long short).
The current UK
sizing system, also, does us no favours. I’m somewhere between a 9 and an 11.
And yes I’m aware those sizes don’t exist in this country. Apparently neither
do I in the eyes of most mainstream (low-budget) clothing shops and in each of
those shops my size varies anyway. I do not
deserve to wear clothes. I should just get me a potato sack and rock
out in that. (It might itch a bit but that’s OK. Apparently I don’t warrant comfort.)
{Dangnabbit, Marilyn, disprove my point, why don't ya? via here} |
Which brings me to my next bone of
contention: fabric.
Unless you have the financial means
to buy everything in the purest silks, linens and cottons, you are restricted
to a delectable offering of acrylic, polyester and viscose.
{via Pinterest} |
And it seems bar one or two
exceptions everything on the high street is made of
freakin’ polyester, acrylic and viscose. Much of my ‘clothes-shopping’
experience last week involved me turning up garments, checking the labels,
growling and turning them down again. 95%
polyester, 5% acrylic.
Which is, sadly, why it’s possible
to buy a blouse at Lime Nark for c£14. Natural fabrics are as taboo as jeans for
Women with Short Legs.
See, here’s the thing: I can step
into a changing room feeling OK about myself. I concede that I could tone up a
bit. (Into the pool I go.)
(I
could also save enough money to shop elsewhere. Now, there’s a radical
thought.)
And ten minutes later I can step
out full of self-loathing. And with skin prickling with excessive static from all the freakin’ polyester. What happens in those ten minutes to turn a
(fairly) rational female into a vehicle of self-hatred?
OK, I’ll admit, PMT weighs in
heavily here. PMT, killer of all rationale and self-confidence.
{Behold! A gratuitous yet wondrous IT Crowd clip for your viewing pleasure.}
I’m sure there’s some advice out
there telling aforementioned rational women not to shop for clothes whilst Under
the Influence of PMT (and I apologise if this is TMI but that’s JTWII*, I’m
just KIR here**).
According to a recent advert
featuring one of TV’s most acclaimed advocates of self-love through
self-acceptance***, negative body image expressed during clothes-shopping can, apparently, be quickly and
effectively quelled by eating a yogurt full of good bacteria.
...Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeah.
No.
It’s my belief that negative body
image can only truly be quelled if we aren’t forced to try on
clothes that we thought might fit but don’t because we're rocking flesh over our bones (how very dare we...), whilst trying to glimpse our sorry, short-a*sed selves in a tiny, warped mirror under cheap,
flickering strip-lighting, whilst under the influence of hormonal surges, whilst -- to add insult to injury -- listening to the poorly auto-tuned vocal
stylings of that teeny-tiny pop star I mentioned earlier. Whoever she may be.
Next time, I'm buying online and dressing in the dark. 'K?
---
*Just The Way It Is.
**Keeping It Real
***His name rhymes with Rock Pan. Sort of. And the message of the advert is not necessarily his fault. Dude's gotta make a living.
No comments:
Post a Comment